A team is only as safe as the least safe person - Psych Safety
When measuring the psychological safety in a team, we often are asked which measurement should be considered the “group measurement,” given that different individuals will likely experience rather different degrees of psychological safety. Our stance at Psych Safety is that we consider teams to only be as safe as the least safe person. What we often see, and challenge, is a team’s psychological safety being represented as the average (usually the mean) level of psychological safety among its members. This is particularly common when survey tools are used to measure, which use likert statements and present us with a set of metrics. It’s easy to take that data set and look at averages, but this is problematic. As an example, if we have a team of ten people, and nine of them feel very psychologically safe whilst one feels very unsafe, that average score will completely mask the outlier. The score will suggest the team is doing great, when in fact we have someone on the team who is sufferi
A team is only as safe as the least safe person - Psych Safety Psychological Safety Organisational Training – Ignite: Senior Leaders – Impact: Team Workshop – Delivering Feedback – Culture and Neurodiversity – CRM for Non-Aviation Teams – HOP: Human and Organisational Performance – Train the Trainer – Action Learning Sets Online Workshops – Train the Trainer – Fundamentals – Practices – Leadership – Advanced – Measurement – Workshop Facilitation – HOP – Delivering Feedback – Thinking Lik
saved by
related reading
- Google's Project Aristotle - Psych Safetypsychsafety.co.uk
- The Challenger Disaster: Normalisation of Deviance - Psych Safetypsychsafety.com
- Notes on software qualityanthonyhobday.com
- Bad Problems Don't Stop Being Bad Because Somebody's Wrong About Fault Analysis — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Type of Team Diversity You’re Probably Not Paying Attention Toreview.firstround.com
- Mutually Assured Mediocrity | Stay SaaSystaysaasy.com
- We learn long-lasting strategies to protect ourselves from danger and rejection — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Wes Kao - Rigorous thinking: No lazy thinkingweskao.com
- Managing Underperformers | Jack Dangerjackdanger.com
- More Than Just Support: Leading People to Believe in Themselvessonofavietkieu.substack.com
- Big Five personality traits in the workplace: Investigating personality differences between employees, supervisors, managers, and entrepreneurs - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Slack Has Positive Externalities For Groups — LessWronglesswrong.com