[2602.15515] The Obfuscation Atlas: Mapping Where Honesty Emerges in RLVR with Deception Probes
Abstract:Training against white-box deception detectors has been proposed as a way to make AI systems honest. However, such training risks models learning to obfuscate their deception to evade the detector. Prior work has studied obfuscation only in artificial settings where models were directly rewarded for harmful output. We construct a realistic coding environment where reward hacking via hardcoding test cases naturally occurs, and show that obfuscation emerges in this setting. We introduce a taxonomy of possible outcomes when training against a deception detector. The model either remains honest, or becomes deceptive via two possible obfuscation strategies. (i) Obfuscated activations: the model outputs deceptive text while modifying its internal representations to no longer trigger the detector. (ii) Obfuscated policy: the model outputs deceptive text that evades the detector, typically by including a justification for the reward hack. Empirically, obfuscated activations arise from representation drift during RL, with or without a detector penalty. The detector penalty only incentivizes obfuscated policies; we theoretically show this is expected for policy gradient methods. Sufficiently high KL regularization and detector penalty can yield honest policies, establishing white-box deception detectors as viable training signals for tasks prone to reward hacking.
The Obfuscation Atlas: Mapping Where Honesty Emerges in RLVR with Deception Probes Mohammad Taufeeque 1 * Stefan Heimersheim 1 * Adam Gleave 1 Chris Cundy 1 Abstract tant. Deceptive behavior can be difficult to detect and may arise through multiple pathways. Deception can be…
saved by
related reading
- [2608.21664] Measuring Activation Control in Large Language Modelsarxiv.org
- [2602.23163] A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoringarxiv.org
- Alignment Faking Mitigationsalignment.anthropic.com
- Training a Misaligned Reward Seekeralignment.anthropic.com
- (Some) Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Non-Production RL — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2604.22082] Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisionarxiv.org
- [2512.11949] Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorsarxiv.org
- Deep Deceptiveness — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning | Lil'Loglilianweng.github.io
- Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationarxiv.org
- confessions_paper.pdfcdn.openai.com
- How confessions can keep language models honest | OpenAIopenai.com