0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 14,624 words · saved by 1 readers
One, two, and three are all integers, and so is negative four. If you keep counting up, or keep counting down, you’re bound to encounter a whole lot…
x 0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities — LessWrong Overly Convenient Excuses Probability & Statistics Frontpage 132 0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities by Eliezer Yudkowsky 10th Jan 2008 5 min read 149 132 One, two, and three are all integers, and so is negative four. If you keep counting up, or keep counting down, you’re bound to encounter a whole lot more integers. You will not, however, encounter anything called “positive infinity” or “negative infinity,” so these are not integers. Positive and negative infinity are not integers, but rather special symbols for talking about the behavior of integers. Peo
related reading
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- 275A, Notes 0: Foundations of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Imprecise Probabilities (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Introduction to Probability by Joseph K. Blitzstein, Jessica Hwang (z-lib.org).pdfuni.dcdev.ro
- Probability theory, understood meta-rationallymeaningness.substack.com
- Sets of Measure Zero in Probability | Jonathan Manton's Blogjmanton.wordpress.com
- 275A, Notes 0: Foundations of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Economics Dictionary of Argumentsphilosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com
- Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic - Christiano 2013intelligence.org
- Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com