Falling fertility on the left as key driver of US birth decline | Scientific Reports
Political orientation has been shown to correlate with fertility, raising the possibility that demographic processes contribute to long-term ideological change. Using data from the US General Social Survey, we analyze completed fertility across 17 birth cohorts (1898–1982) to examine how political orientation has contributed to fertility decline in the United States and whether emerging selective forces can be detected. Earlier cohorts show little difference in fertility by political orientation. From the 1943–1947 birth cohort onward, however, a pronounced divergence emerges: individuals with right-wing political orientations maintain fertility at or above replacement level, whereas fertility among left-wing individuals declines sharply to well below replacement. Applying Lande–Arnold selection gradient analyses, we find increasing directional selection that may favor right-wing political orientation over time, while education shows consistent negative associations with fertility and religiosity positive but weaker effects. Separate analysis of Black and White Americans reveals, however, that the increasingly stronger association between political orientation and fertility in more recent cohorts holds only true for whites but not for blacks. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that recent fertility decline in the United States is driven disproportionately by left-leaning individuals and point to contemporary demographic processes that may gradually shift the ideological composition of populations.
Introduction Fieder and Huber1 examined whether political leanings relate to fertility, potentially reflecting biological selection of political attitudes. Since political attitudes may have genetic bases2, a fertility link could suggest selection pressures. Using the World Value Survey (WVS), they found a U-shaped pattern: individuals with strong left- or right-wing views had more children than moderates, though conservatives showed a stronger effect, suggesting balancing selection. In the European SHARE and the US GSS, however, only conservatives consistently had more children. At least…
saved by
related reading
- Why Is Fertility Down, and What Can Be Done About It?unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com
- The 25 Most Interesting Ideas I've Found in 2025 (So Far)derekthompson.org
- The End of Children | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic reviewnature.com
- The Global Fertility Crisis Is Worse Than You Probably Thinkderekthompson.org
- The Real Causes of the Baby Boom: Tech, Medicine & Housingworksinprogress.co
- There are no sane policy solutions to population collapseparentingthrough.substack.com
- Does higher density cause lower birth rates?worksinprogress.news
- Survey Results I: Basic Demographics and Politicsrichardhanania.substack.com
- Economists blame America’s plummeting fertility rates on the rise of the iPhone | Fortunefortune.com
- Let's F*ck!hugobrtx.substack.com
- You're probably wrong about how things have changedexperimental-history.com