Nicholas Decker In Hell - by Scott Alexander
substack.com · 3,552 words · saved by 1 readers
...
I. Econblogger Nicholas Decker is not a fan of AI 2040: One of the centerpieces of AI 2040 is the proposal that we pause the development of AI at a high level, use the AI to research alignment, and only then proceed. I am skeptical of this, and not only because it seems impractical to get such cooperation. My first argument is that I do not believe a period of “researching alignment” is meaningful – alignment research is simply capabilities research, patching particular bugs in the system, and we’re not going to find anything deep without actually being in contact with the systems […] I…
saved by
related reading
- My AI Opinions - by Scott Alexander - Astral Codex Tensubstack.com
- Shtetl-Optimized >> Blog Archive >> Theory and AI Alignmentscottaaronson.blog
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Another (outer) alignment failure story — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com