flâneur

Universal prescriptivism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org · 1,390 words · saved by 1 readers

Universal prescriptivism (often simply called prescriptivism) is the meta-ethical view that claims that, rather than expressing propositions, ethical sentences function similarly to imperatives which are universalizable—whoever makes a moral judgment is committed to the same judgment in any situation where the same relevant facts pertain.[1][2] This makes prescriptivism a universalist form of non-cognitivism. Prescriptivism stands in opposition to other forms of non-cognitivism (such as emotivism and quasi-realism), as well as to all forms of cognitivism (including both moral realism and ethical subjectivism).[3] Since prescriptivism was introduced by philosopher R. M. Hare in his 1952 book The Language of Morals, it has been compared to emotivism and to the categorical imperative of Immanuel Kant.[4][5] Unlike Kant, however, Hare does not invoke universalizability as a test of moral permissibility. Instead, he sees it as a consistency requirement that is built into the logic of moral

Universal prescriptivism - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Meta-ethical view Not to be confused with Linguistic prescription . This article may contain original research . Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations . Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. ( January 2012 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this message ) Universal prescriptivism (often simply called prescriptivism ) is the meta-ethical view that claims that, rather than expressing propositions , ethical sentences function similarly to imper

related reading