The State of Uniswap Governance: A Paradox of Minimization
otherinter.net · 5,312 words · saved by 1 readers
The ground truth of Uniswap governance and its greatest opportunities for improvement.
The State of Uniswap Governance: A Paradox of Minimization The State of Uniswap Governance: A Paradox of Minimization Authors Published May 25 2022 Other Internet embarked on a listening tour with a diverse set of Uniswap stakeholders during the first quarter of 2022. Our aim was to identify the most pressing issue areas within the Uniswap community and provide ideas to improve protocol governance. The “paradox of minimization” is a thread that ran through almost all our conversations: how can we think about increasing governance participation when Uniswap’s governance surface area has been qu
related reading
- LVR-minimization in Uniswap V4 - Decentralized exchanges - Ethereum Researchethresear.ch
- Ethereum is a Dark Forest - Paradigmparadigm.xyz
- Governance Process | Uniswap Developersdocs.uniswap.org
- Should Ethereum be okay with enshrining more things in the protocol?vitalik.eth.limo
- The Ownership Economy 2022 – Variantvariant.fund
- UniswapX and the DAO - Governance-Meta - Uniswap Governancegov.uniswap.org
- Sufficient Decentralization - by Marc Boiron.docxvariant.fund
- Policy Proposals for Crypto Protocols to Make Them Less Dystopic and More Inclusivehackernoon.com
- The Unreasonable Sufficiency of Protocols | Summer of Protocolsvenkatesh-rao.gitbook.io
- Decentralized Governance and the Lessons of Corporate Governancecorpgov.law.harvard.edu
- Tokens vs. Equitydefieducation.substack.com
- Report: Uniswap Labs Business Breakdown & Founding Story | Contrary Researchresearch.contrary.com