Policy Proposals for Crypto Protocols to Make Them Less Dystopic and More Inclusive | HackerNoon
hackernoon.com · 1,683 words · saved by 1 readers
The debates are intensifying about whether blockchain and cryptocurrencies and Web3—pick your favorite jargon—are salvific or demonic.
Image via Stocksy United, a worker-owned stock-photo platform. The debates are intensifying about whether blockchain and cryptocurrencies and Web3—pick your favorite jargon—are salvific or demonic. Having reported on and ridiculed this stuff for a good while, I find myself less enthralled than many of my friends with the question of whether crypto should exist. It does, and it is spreading. To me the far more important question is how we use it, limit it, and encourage its better angels to flourish. What are those better angels? Crypto is a tool for designing institutions. At a time when…
saved by
related reading
- What is the point of crypto?vox.com
- What I'm frustrated by in cryptoamirbolous.com
- Crypto's Three-Body Problemotherinter.net
- Moxie Marlinspike >> Blog >> My first impressions of web3moxie.org
- Who will control crypto? — saffronsaffron.mirror.xyz
- Why I’m cryptophobic - Bessemer Venture Partnersbvp.com
- The Web3 Movement’s Quest to Build a ‘Can’t Be Evil’ Internet | WIREDwired.com
- The Latecomer’s Guide to Crypto - The New York Timesnytimes.com
- The Casino on Mars - Paradigmparadigm.xyz
- Three quarks | David Phelps | Substackdavidphelps.substack.com
- Against choosing your political allegiances based on who is "pro-crypto"vitalik.eth.limo
- Crypto Commons. Many crypto enthusiasts are looking at… | by Mike Maples, Jr. | Mediummedium.com