Maps, the territory, and meta-rationality | Meta-rationality
metarationality.com · 7,204 words · saved by 1 readers
“The map is not the territory”—what is it then? How do rational models actually work?
“The map is not the territory.” A much-quoted aphorism… but I’ve often wondered what it means. Who ever thought that the map was the territory? No one could make this mistake regarding an actual map. Apparently this is a metaphor… What is it supposed to imply? 1 The basic meaning of the metaphor is that representations (such as maps) do not perfectly reflect what they represent. Unthinkingly following an inaccurate map, you might try to drive to an island in the Pacific Ocean . Analogous mistakes are more common with other sorts of representations. This essay uses the metaphor to introduce sev
related reading
- Map–territory relation - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Map Is Not the Territoryfs.blog
- Mini Blog Post 12: The Map is not the Territory - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- In the Cells of the Eggplant | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Gears in understanding — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- A Map is Not a Blueprint: Why Fixing Nature Failsblog.nateliason.com
- Map Room: A Radical Reading List on Cartographic Power, Perspective, and Possibility - Longreadslongreads.com
- In Praise of the Godssimonsarris.substack.com
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Should this be a map or 500 maps? - by Elan Ullendorffescapethealgorithm.substack.com
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com