Maps, the territory, and meta-rationality | Meta-rationality
metarationality.com · 7,204 words · saved by 1 readers
“The map is not the territory”—what is it then? How do rational models actually work?
“The map is not the territory.” A much-quoted aphorism… but I’ve often wondered what it means. Who ever thought that the map was the territory? No one could make this mistake regarding an actual map. Apparently this is a metaphor… What is it supposed to imply? 1 The basic meaning of the metaphor is that representations (such as maps) do not perfectly reflect what they represent. Unthinkingly following an inaccurate map, you might try to drive to an island in the Pacific Ocean . Analogous mistakes are more common with other sorts of representations. This essay uses the metaphor to introduce sev
related reading
- The Map Is Not the Territoryfs.blog
- Map–territory relation - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- In the Cells of the Eggplant | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Gears in understanding — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Mental Models: The Best Way to Make Intelligent Decisions (~100 Models Explained)fs.blog
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Rationality and refrigerators | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Meta-rationality: An introduction | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Probability theory, understood meta-rationallymeaningness.substack.com
- Clouds and eggplants | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- A bridge to meta-rationality vs. civilizational collapse | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com