Making Sense of the “Do Nudges Work?” Debate - By Michael Hallsworth - Behavioral Scientist
behavioralscientist.org · 1,249 words · saved by 1 readers
A recent pair of articles offer wildly different verdicts on nudges, and show how we urgently need a new kind of debate.
The concept of nudge has proved wildly popular since Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein published their book of the same name in 2008. Over the past 14 years, hundreds of studies have been published that could be categorized as testing nudges (although the term has been applied quite loosely). Back in January 2022, the journal PNAS published an attempt to combine these nudge studies into a meta-analysis . This analysis concluded that the studies had an overall effect size of d = 0.43. That’s fairly substantial—it’s about the same as the effect of interventions to increase motor skills in childre
saved by
related reading
- Nudge theory doesn’t work after all, says new evidence review – but it could still have a futuretheconversation.com
- Cultural evolutionary behavioural science in public policy | Behavioural Public Policy | Cambridge Corecambridge.org
- No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you – [citation needed]talyarkoni.org
- Nudge theory - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Incentives are for losersexperimental-history.com
- A Crash Course in the Neuroscience of Human Motivation — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Nudge (book) - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Control Group Is Out Of Controlslatestarcodex.com
- The Impact of Ideasjessylin.com
- What a nerdy debate about p-values shows about science — and how to fix it | Voxvox.com
- Toward A Public Science of Model Behavior | Transluce AItransluce.org