Why the definition of design might need a change | MIT Technology Review
technologyreview.com · 1,707 words · saved by 1 readers
When we unpack its current meaning, we may find that we want—and need—to retool the word yet again.
Why the definition of design might need a change | MIT Technology Review Skip to Content It was drawing, or disegno , as deployed in the making of Italian buildings during the Renaissance, that gave us the word “design”—or such was the enthusiastic explanation I received as an architecture student at the end of the 1990s. History, of course, tells a more complex story. Though there was indeed a key shift in the meaning of “design” between 1300 and 1500, it had less to do with language and more with a fundamental shift in the making of things themselves. The relationship between drawing and des
saved by
related reading
- Taste for Makerspaulgraham.com
- 101 Design Rules | COLLINSwearecollins.com
- The Anti-Slop Aesthetichyphen.art
- Design Literacy - by Willem Van Lancker - WVLvanlancker.substack.com
- What Does It Mean to Decolonize Design? – Eye on Designeyeondesign.aiga.org
- Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong? | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- What is design? | Koos Looijesteijnkooslooijesteijn.net
- Notes from Glenn Parsons’ The Philosophy of Design — Christoph Locher · Interaction Designerchristophlocher.com
- On Speculative Design | Benjamin H. Bratton - DIS MagazineDIS Magazinedismagazine.com
- Design Engineeringmarcelochaman.com
- Maybe Design Needs to Do Less to Be Taken More Seriouslytwongsthoughts.substack.com
- Karri Saarinen on X: "Design is a search" / Xx.com