Why the definition of design might need a change | MIT Technology Review
technologyreview.com · 1,707 words · saved by 1 readers
When we unpack its current meaning, we may find that we want—and need—to retool the word yet again.
Why the definition of design might need a change | MIT Technology Review Skip to Content It was drawing, or disegno , as deployed in the making of Italian buildings during the Renaissance, that gave us the word “design”—or such was the enthusiastic explanation I received as an architecture student at the end of the 1990s. History, of course, tells a more complex story. Though there was indeed a key shift in the meaning of “design” between 1300 and 1500, it had less to do with language and more with a fundamental shift in the making of things themselves. The relationship between drawing and des
saved by
related reading
- Design Literacy - by Willem Van Lancker - WVLvanlancker.substack.com
- Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong? | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- What is design? | Koos Looijesteijnkooslooijesteijn.net
- The State of UX in 2025trends.uxdesign.cc
- A Collection of Design Engineersmaggieappleton.com
- How Design Tools Like Figma and Canva Are Impacting Designers | Futurefuture.a16z.com
- Maybe Design Needs to Do Less to Be Taken More Seriouslytwongsthoughts.substack.com
- The Attributes of a Design Engineer - Kathryn Gonzalez - Independent Design and Engineering Directorryngonzalez.com
- Design Literacy In the Age of Intelligent Automation | Terrainterrain.com
- Design Engineeringmarcelochaman.com
- Output isn’t design - Linearlinear.app
- Why We Crave Software With Style Over "Branding" | Futurefuture.com