Can risk aversion learned at low stakes generalize to astronomically high stakes?
This post covers our recent paper: Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Risk Aversion in Language Models. It gives the intro, main results, and example prompts from the training and evaluation sets. For everything else, see the paper.
This post covers our recent paper: Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Risk Aversion in Language Models. It gives the intro, main results, and example prompts from the training and evaluation sets. For everything else, see the paper. Training AIs to be risk-averse in resources could be a useful failsafe in case of misalignment. Misaligned but risk-averse AIs would tend to prefer a higher chance of modest payments to a lower chance of successful rebellion, so in many circumstances we could pay these AIs to cooperate with us. But we can only feasibly train AIs to be risk-averse on…
saved by
related reading
- Risk from fitness-seeking AIs: mechanisms and mitigationssubstack.com
- Risk-Averse AIsforethought.org
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- [2502.17424] Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMsarxiv.org
- How far does alignment midtraining generalize?alignment.openai.com
- Self-Fulfilling Misalignment Data Might Be Poisoning Our AI Modelsturntrout.com
- Agentic misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- [2604.22082] Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisionarxiv.org
- Natural-emergent-misalignment-from-reward-hacking-paper.pdfassets.anthropic.com
- Surfacing Pathological Behaviors in Language Models | Transluce AItransluce.org
- [2603.02202] Frontier Models Can Take Actions at Low Probabilitiesarxiv.org
- [2510.13786] The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMsarxiv.org