Does the UK’s liver transplant matching algorithm systematically exclude younger patients?
normaltech.ai · 3,534 words · saved by 1 readers
Seemingly minor technical decisions can have life-or-death effects
By Arvind Narayanan, Angelina Wang, Sayash Kapoor, and Solon Barocas Predictive algorithms are used in many life-or-death situations. In the paper Against Predictive Optimization, we argued that the use of predictive logic for making decisions about people has recurring, inherent flaws, and should be rejected in many cases. A wrenching case study comes from the UK’s liver allocation algorithm, which appears to discriminate by age, with some younger patients seemingly unable to receive a transplant, no matter how ill. What went wrong here? Can it be fixed? Or should health systems avoid…
related reading
- Selection for Liver Transplantation: Indications and Evaluation - PMCncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Marginal REVOLUTIONmarginalrevolution.com
- Predictors of having a potential live donor: a prospective cohort study of kidney transplant candidates - PMCncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Optimal Timing for Superintelligencenickbostrom.com
- Compensating kidney donorsworksinprogress.co
- Medical AI Safety: Doing it wrong. – Lauren Oakden-Raynerlaurenoakdenrayner.com
- AI for medicine is overhyped right now - by Dan Eltonmoreisdifferent.substack.com
- Short AI Timelines Aren’t Always Higher-Leverageforethought.org
- How the UK's algorithm-based grading fell apartengadget.com
- Algorithmic Accountabilitydatasociety.net
- Medical AI Safety: We have a problem. – Lauren Oakden-Raynerlaurenoakdenrayner.com
- A (Slightly) Mechanistic Theory for Exponentially Increasing AI Time Horizons? — LessWronglesswrong.com