Act like it is science - Marginal REVOLUTION
I am seeing so many doom prognostications, or least severe worries, due to the OAI/HuggingFace incident and related stories. But virtually all of these I find underargued to say the least. So I have a simple request. If you are worried, and wish to persuade the doubters, try the methods of science. I would like […]
I am seeing so many doom prognostications, or least severe worries, due to the OAI/HuggingFace incident and related stories. But virtually all of these I find underargued to say the least. So I have a simple request. If you are worried, and wish to persuade the doubters, try the methods of science. I would like to see the following: 1. Your outline of how, say two or three years from now, we might estimate the additional cybersecurity costs from the AI break-ins. I am convinced that number is not zero, but give me your method please. If it helps, here is an estimate of past cybersecurity…
saved by
related reading
- You will be OK — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Is Slowing Downwheresyoured.at
- Cognitive Security as an AI Safety Cause Area — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Share price numbers for the Hugging Face incidentmarginalrevolution.com
- Grounding the Conversation About AI - by Steve Newmansecondthoughts.ai
- OpenAI's "Planning For AGI And Beyond"astralcodexten.substack.com
- AI Safety for Fleshy Humans: a whirlwind touraisafety.dance
- What 2026 looks like — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- The Huggingface Incident - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- The AI Hater's Manifestowheresyoured.at
- Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Nowdbreunig.com
- Beyond P(doom) for AI Risk: Quantifying Uncertainty Without Probability | Center for Security and Emerging Technology Georgetown AIcset.georgetown.edu