Google’s powerful AI spotlights a human cognitive glitch | Ars Technica
arstechnica.com · 1,329 words · saved by 1 readers
There's a big difference between fluent speech and fluent thought.
Text settings Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav When you read a sentence like this one, your past experience tells you that it’s written by a thinking, feeling human. And, in this case, there is indeed a human typing these words: [Hi, there!] But these days, some sentences that appear remarkably humanlike are actually generated by artificial intelligence systems trained on massive amounts of human text. People are so accustomed to assuming that fluent language comes from a thinking, feeling human that
related reading
- Tracing the thoughts of a large language model \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Do large language models understand us? | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Mediummedium.com
- Language Models in Plato's Cave - by Sergey Levinesergeylevine.substack.com
- Did Google’s A.I. Just Become Sentient? Two Employees Think So.youtube.com
- AI And The Limits Of Languagenoemamag.com
- ChatGPT Is Nothing Like a Human, Says Linguist Emily Bendernymag.com
- Emergent introspective awareness in large language models \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- How AI Is Learning to Think in Secretnickandresen.substack.com
- 2301.06627arxiv.org
- Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Herenoemamag.com