ChatGPT Is Nothing Like a Human, Says Linguist Emily Bender
nymag.com · 6,427 words · saved by 7 readers
And a chatbot is not a human. And a linguist named Emily M. Bender is very worried what will happen when we forget this.
Photo: Ian Allen This article was featured in One Great Story , New York ’s reading recommendation newsletter. Sign up here to get it nightly. Nobody likes an I-told-you-so. But before Microsoft’s Bing started cranking out creepy love letters; before Meta’s Galactica spewed racist rants; before ChatGPT began writing such perfectly decent college essays that some professors said, “Screw it, I’ll just stop grading”; and before tech reporters sprinted to claw back claims that AI was the future of search, maybe the future of everything else, too, Emily M. Bender co-wrote the octopus paper. Bender
saved by
related reading
- Why Chatbots Are Not the Future of Interfaceswattenberger.com
- The Yale Review | Melanie Mitchell: The Dangerous Unknowns at the…yalereview.org
- Some thoughts on human-AI relationships - by Joanne Jangreservoirsamples.substack.com
- ChatGPT Is Dumber Than You Think - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- AI Friends Too Cheap To Meterjasmi.news
- All-knowing machines are a fantasy | Emily M. Bender and Chriag Shah >> IAI TViai.tv
- On NYT Magazine on AI: Resist the Urge to be Impressed | by Emily M. Bender | Mediummedium.com
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- the post-literate societyjasmi.news
- What Is Claude? Anthropic Doesn’t Know, Either | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- When ChatGPT Broke an Entire Field: An Oral History | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org