Against Full Scale IQ Fetishism - by Sebastian Jensen
sebjenseb.substack.com · 2,115 words · saved by 1 readers
Why it is entirely possible Scott Alexander and Kasparov's IQ is 135
Foreword A few years ago I got into a debate over me having estimated the IQ of Scott Alexander at 133. I still think the estimate is largely defensible. Many found it comical that such an accomplished and talented writer could have an IQ so “low”, when in reality it is possible this is his real score. I. I don’t intend to be another idiot who tries to challenge the solid consensus of intelligence research: that IQ tests are highly reliable, rarely culturally biased, highly predictive of academic outcomes, and moderately predictive of life outcomes. Instead, I would like to contest how…
related reading
- Information Processing: Success, Ability, and all thatinfoproc.blogspot.com
- Why Are Individual IQ Differences OK? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Smart People Believe Stupid Thingsgurwinder.substack.com
- Hotel Concierge — The Stanford Marshmallow Prison Experimenthotelconcierge.tumblr.com
- Your IQ isn't 160. No one's is.theintrinsicperspective.com
- IQ is a dismal measure of intelligence - supermemo.gurusupermemo.guru
- Attention is all we havedavidbessis.substack.com
- Why aren't smart people happier? - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- My Childhood Death Spiral — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Parable Of The Talents | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- The mistake of conflating intelligence and powerdwarkesh.com