In Defense of AI Slop - by Evan Armstrong - The Leverage
substack.com · 1,485 words · saved by 1 readers
How can we reckon with the usefulness of LLMs?
In Defense of AI Slop How can we reckon with the usefulness of LLMs? Evan Armstrong May 08, 2026 ∙ Paid 61 2 12 Share Reading the internet is an exercise in the olfactory department. Every funding post on LinkedIn, every overly confessional Substack essay, reeks faintly of digital manure. AI slop is stinking up the web. The writing it offers is smoothbrained, uninteresting, limp-dicked drivel. I hate how it is changing so much of my online experience. And, in a sign of how incentives influence beliefs, I hate how it makes the market for my newsletter so much more competitive. This frustration
saved by
related reading
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- God help me am I about to change my view on AI-assisted writing?rivalvoices.substack.com
- AI slop, suspicion, and writing back | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- The 5 Types of AI Slop — A Complete Taxonomy with Examplesslopdetector.org
- Why Slop Mattersarxiv.org
- Don't Let LLMs Write For You — LessWronglesswrong.com
- 32 notes on AI & writingjasmi.news
- We Can't Let AI Writing Take Over the Internetderekthompson.org
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- Stop Sloppypasta: Don't paste raw LLM output at peoplestopsloppypasta.ai
- Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Everyevery.to