Underdetermination
In the philosophy of science, underdetermination or the underdetermination of theory by data (sometimes abbreviated UTD) is the idea that evidence available to us at a given time may be insufficient to determine what beliefs we should hold in response to it. The underdetermination thesis states that all evidence necessarily underdetermines any scientific theory.
Underdetermination - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Idea in the philosophy of science For the mathematical term involving systems of linear equations, see Underdetermined system . This article includes a list of general references but lacks corresponding inline citations . Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. ( March 2016 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this message ) In the philosophy of science , underdetermination or the underdetermination of theory by data (sometimes abbreviated UTD ) is the idea that evidence available t
related reading
- The Beginning of Infinity, Part 1nav.al
- Demarcation problem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Karl Popper (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- An irrational constraint is the motivating force in modern scienceaeon.co
- Dark Side Epistemology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Duhem–Quine thesis - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Problems of Philosophy | Project Gutenberggutenberg.org
- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Confirmation holism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- What is Evidence? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Towards a Formal Scientific Epistemologymindthefuture.info
- Confirmation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu