The banality of ChatGPT - by Erik Hoel
erikhoel.substack.com · 2,968 words · saved by 1 readers
Passing the Turing test turns out to be boring
Despite being the culmination of a century-long dream, no better word describes the much-discussed output of OpenAI’s ChatGPT than the colloquial “mid.” I understand that this may be seen as downplaying its achievement. As those who’ve been paying attention to this space can attest, ChatGPT is by far the most impressive AI the public has had access to. It can basically pass the Turing test—conversationally, it acts much like a human. These new changes are from it having been given a lot of feedback and tutoring by humans themselves. ChatGPT was created by taking the original GPT-3 model and…
related reading
- ChatGPT Is Dumber Than You Think - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- AI Friends Too Cheap To Meterjasmi.news
- #138: Do you pass the Turing test?haleynahman.substack.com
- trees are harlequins, words are harlequins - the voidnostalgebraist.tumblr.com
- ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Turing Test (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Collections: On ChatGPT – A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantryacoup.blog
- Giving GPT-3 a Turing Testlacker.io
- [2302.03494] A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failuresarxiv.org
- ChatGPT Is Nothing Like a Human, Says Linguist Emily Bendernymag.com
- Humans Who Are Not Concentrating Are Not General Intelligences | Otiumsrconstantin.wordpress.com
- The Yale Review | Melanie Mitchell: The Dangerous Unknowns at the…yalereview.org