The banality of ChatGPT - by Erik Hoel
erikhoel.substack.com · 2,968 words · saved by 1 readers
Passing the Turing test turns out to be boring
Despite being the culmination of a century-long dream, no better word describes the much-discussed output of OpenAI’s ChatGPT than the colloquial “mid.” I understand that this may be seen as downplaying its achievement. As those who’ve been paying attention to this space can attest, ChatGPT is by far the most impressive AI the public has had access to. It can basically pass the Turing test—conversationally, it acts much like a human. These new changes are from it having been given a lot of feedback and tutoring by humans themselves. ChatGPT was created by taking the original GPT-3 model and…
related reading
- ChatGPT Is Dumber Than You Think - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- AI Friends Too Cheap To Meterjasmi.news
- What Is ChatGPT Doing … and Why Does It Work?-Stephen Wolfram Writingswritings.stephenwolfram.com
- Giving GPT-3 a Turing Testlacker.io
- Collections: On ChatGPT – A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantryacoup.blog
- Why Chatbots Are Not the Future of Interfaceswattenberger.com
- ChatGPT Is Nothing Like a Human, Says Linguist Emily Bendernymag.com
- the post-literate societyjasmi.news
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- [2302.03494] A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failuresarxiv.org
- The Yale Review | Melanie Mitchell: The Dangerous Unknowns at the…yalereview.org
- ChatGPT is a bullshit generator. But it can still be amazingly usefulnormaltech.ai