Humanists Have Done Nothing Wrong | Defector
For many years, I’ve held a pet theory that cultural consumers can be grouped into two broad categories: Primary Source People and Secondary Source People. The former are the book lovers, cinephiles, archive perusers, and history buffs who grew to love their areas of study because of the specific objects that constitute the field: the…
For many years, I’ve held a pet theory that cultural consumers can be grouped into two broad categories: Primary Source People and Secondary Source People. The former are the book lovers, cinephiles, archive perusers, and history buffs who grew to love their areas of study because of the specific objects that constitute the field: the two women I overheard whispering about how they wanted to fuck Adam Bede, in one of my undergrad classes; the student of mine who disclosed that he loved The House of Mirth because “something similar happened to me recently” (????); or the guy who collects…
saved by
related reading
- All the nerds are deadsamkriss.substack.com
- 28 slightly rude notes on writingexperimental-history.com
- What Did We Learn From Lex Fridman's Book List?regressstudies.substack.com
- Dispatches From the Trenches of World War Humanities | by Joshua Grasso | Mediumjoshuagrasso-58239.medium.com
- What's the point of words?samkriss.substack.com
- The Honest Case for the Humanitiessubstack.com
- How the MFA swallowed literatureerikhoel.substack.com
- Paglia’s Exaggerationsblakeesmith.substack.com
- Will the Humanities Survive Artificial Intelligence? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The privilege of bad writerscoreyrobin.com
- notes on style and authoritysubstack.com
- A Golden Age? | Vinduet.novinduet.no