Notes from the Lighthaven Daniel Kokotajlo & Dean Ball debate
jasminexli.substack.com · 2,399 words · saved by 1 readers
timely thoughts on regulation, centralization, & AI risk
Notes from the Lighthaven Daniel Kokotajlo & Dean Ball debate timely thoughts on regulation, centralization, & AI risk Jasmine Li Mar 10, 2026 45 12 6 Share event was on 3/9/26, ran by anti-debate ! edited with opus 4.6. i did my best to accurately represent the arguments — let me know of any misrepresentations! TLDR and summary first; my takes at the end. Debate Question: Given advanced AI, is it time for government to step in and guide development, or should we leave it to the market? TLDR: Kokotajlo thinks regulation is necessary because concentration of power (both corporate and government
related reading
- Notes from the Lighthaven Daniel Kokotajlo & Dean Ball debatesubstack.com
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Dario Amodei — Policy on the AI Exponentialdarioamodei.com
- Strategic Visionsstatic1.squarespace.com
- AI Regulation is Unsafe — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Breaking the Intelligence Curse - The Intelligence Curseintelligence-curse.ai
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Introducing Plan A - by Scott Alexander - Astral Codex Tenastralcodexten.com
- Soft Nationalization: How the US Government Will Control AI Labs | Convergence Analysisconvergenceanalysis.org
- Roundtable of the Deal of the Century on AI - Q4 2026 — CBPAIcbpai.org
- Policy ideas for mitigating AI risk — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Soft Nationalization: how the USG will control AI labs — LessWronglesswrong.com