MIT for Noncommercial is Broken — /dev/lawyer
writing.kemitchell.com · 401 words · saved by 1 readers
use a real noncommercial software license
January 21, 2022 MIT for Noncommercial is Brokenuse a real noncommercial software license I recently read through James Turner’s “Open Source Has a Funding Problem” on the Stack Overflow blog. I recommend it. Great addition to all the new writing on open software funding and business realities. There was one minor error that bothered me, mentioned just in passing: For example, having a dual licensing of MIT for non-commercial and a custom license for commercial purposes. I get what that means. I think others will, too. But legally, it doesn’t work. Don’t say “MIT, but only for…
saved by
related reading
- software licenses by AJ.pdfdrive.google.com
- Open-core modelen.wikipedia.org
- Strategy Letter V – Joel on Softwarejoelonsoftware.com
- Commercial Type » Catalog » Neue Haas Grotesk Collectioncommercialtype.com
- Open Source is not a Business Modelcra.mr
- Open Source is Not About Yougist.github.com
- More Money For Better Open-Source Softwaremarijnhaverbeke.nl
- The Cathedral and the Bazaar - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- alt.redalt.red
- 오픈소스 라이선스 변화의 흐름tech.kakao.com
- Playing the Open Source Game | Loris Cro's Blogkristoff.it
- Bambu Lab is abusing the open source social contract - Jeff Geerlingjeffgeerling.com