The importance of how you weigh it - Joe Carlsmith
Much of normative ethics centers on which considerations matter, and why. But often, it makes a bigger difference *how much* a consideration matters. I worry that neglecting this leads to the wrong sorts of arguments and points of focus.
The importance of how you weigh it - Joe Carlsmith The importance of how you weigh it Contents hide I. The basic set, and beyond II. Academic incentives III. Weightings are harder IV. Ethical expertise V. Basic set hypotheses VI. Does the difference between consequentialism and non-consequentialism actually matter? VII. Is there a field here? Last updated: 03.29.2021 Published: 03.28.2021 The importance of how you weigh it Like, nobody,” she says, “is considering the décor! G.A. Cohen, “Rescuing Conservatism Much of normative ethics centers on which considerations matter, and
related reading
- Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Seeing more whole - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On infinite ethics - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Deontology and virtue ethics as "effective theories" of consequentialist ethics — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Deep atheism and AI risk - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On the limits of idealized values - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Crucial Considerations and Wise Philanthropynickbostrom.com
- Alienation and meta-ethics (or: is it possible you should maximize helium?) - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Why aesthetic value should take priority over moral valueaeon.co
- Alignment & Succession: Morality Lives in the Human Individualnosetgauge.com