There are four kinds of randomness: ontic, epistemic, pseudo and…
arxiv.org · 7,457 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
On “Why” and “What” of randomness Soubhik Chakraborty Department of Applied Mathematics Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra Ranchi-835215 INDIA Email: soubhikc@yahoo.co.in If the numbers are not random, they are at least higgledy-piggledy. - George Marsaglia (1984), quoted by D. E. Knuth on p. 179 of ref [5] Extended Abstract: This paper has several objectives. First, it separates randomness from lawlessness and shows why even genuine randomness does not imply lawlessness.…
related reading
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- 254A, Notes 0: A review of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Chaos and Randomnessblog.evjang.com
- The Power of Noise — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Musings on typicality – Sander Dielemansander.ai
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Imprecise Probabilities (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Ale Epistat.berkeley.edu
- Mobius-Randomness-and-Dynamics.pdfaustms.org.au
- Computer Scientists Figure Out How To Prove Lies | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Experimental randomness amplificationnature.com