Musings on typicality – Sander Dieleman
sander.ai · 5,108 words · saved by 3 readers
A summary of my current thoughts on typicality, and its relevance to likelihood-based generative models.
If you’re training or sampling from generative models, typicality is a concept worth understanding. It sheds light on why beam search doesn’t work for autoregressive models of images, audio and video; why you can’t just threshold the likelihood to perform anomaly detection with generative models; and why high-dimensional Gaussians are “soap bubbles”. This post is a summary of my current thoughts on the topic. First, some context: one of the reasons I’m writing this, is to structure my own thoughts about typicality and the unintuitive behaviour of high-dimensional probability distributions. Mos
saved by
related reading
- Musings on typicality – Sander Dielemanbenanne.github.io
- Generative modelling in latent space – Sander Dielemansander.ai
- Generating music in the waveform domain – Sander Dielemansander.ai
- Diffusion is spectral autoregression – Sander Dielemansander.ai
- Tips for Training Likelihood Modelsblog.evjang.com
- Six (and a half) intuitions for KL divergence — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What are Diffusion Models? | Lil'Loglilianweng.github.io
- Maybe I was too harsh on deep learning theory (three days ago) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Diffusion is not necessarily Spectral Autoregression | Fabian Falckfabianfalck.com
- Learning the integral of a diffusion model – Sander Dielemansander.ai
- Do Machine Learning Models Memorize or Generalize?pair.withgoogle.com
- Diffusion models from scratchchenyang.co