What a Sixty-Five-Year-Old Book Teaches Us About A.I. | The New Yorker

Rereading an oddly resonant—and prescient—consideration of how computation affects learning.

Save this story Save this story Neural networks have become shockingly good at generating natural-sounding text, on almost any subject. If I were a student, I’d be thrilled—let a chatbot write that five-page paper on Hamlet’s indecision!—but if I were a teacher I’d have mixed feelings. On the one hand, the quality of student essays is about to go through the roof. On the other, what’s the point of asking anyone to write anything anymore? Luckily for us, thoughtful people long ago anticipated the rise of artificial intelligence and wrestled with some of the thornier issues. I’m thinking in part

related reading

• Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• The machines are fine. I'm worried about us.ergosphere.blog
• What Will It Take to Get A.I. Out of Schools? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• AI makes the humanities more important, but also a lot weirderresobscura.substack.com
• Can A.I. Produce Writing That We Actually Want to Read? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | The New Yorkerweb.archive.org
• Will the Humanities Survive Artificial Intelligence? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• The New Poem-Making Machinery | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
• I knew my writing students were using AI. Their confessions led to a powerful teaching moment | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardiantheguardian.com
• What Happens After A.I. Destroys College Writing?youtube.com
• Will AI Break the University? - by Rory Truex - Civic Forumrorytruex.substack.com