Against Steelmanning | Thing of Things
I hate the word ‘steelmanning.’ Steelmanning refers to arguing with the best possible version of someone’s argument, even if it’s not the one they presented. Put like that, …
Tags ozy blog post , rationality I hate the word ‘steelmanning.’ Steelmanning refers to arguing with the best possible version of someone’s argument, even if it’s not the one they presented . Put like that, it sounds really good! After all, we all think it’s important not to misrepresent people [citation needed]; trying to present the best possible version of someone’s argument is good. The problem is that every time I’ve seen the word ‘steelman’ used, it’s referring to one of two things. In the least obnoxious case, Alice misinterpre
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How to Win Arguments and Manipulate Managersevery.to
- How to Win Arguments and Manipulate Managersevery.to
- Fucking Goddamn Basics of Rationalist Discourse — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- The Beigeness, or How to Kill People with Bad Writing: The Scott Alexander Method – Eruditorum Presseruditorumpress.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Annoyingly Principled People, and what befalls them — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Taboo Your Words — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How to Disagreepaulgraham.com
- In My Misanthropy Era — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How To Write Quickly While Maintaining Epistemic Rigor — LessWronglesswrong.com