✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
One Argument Against An Army — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 3,999 words · saved by 1 readers
I talked about a style of reasoning in which not a single contrary argument is allowed, with the result that every non-supporting observation has to…
x One Argument Against An Army — LessWrong Against Rationalization Motivated Reasoning Rationalization Frontpage 127 One Argument Against An Army by Eliezer Yudkowsky 15th Aug 2007 2 min read 37 127 I talked about a style of reasoning in which not a single contrary argument is allowed, with the result that every non-supporting observation has to be argued away. Here I suggest that when people encounter a contrary argument, they prevent themselves from downshifting their confidence by rehearsing already-known support. Suppose the country of Freedonia is debating whether its neighbor, Sylvania,
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Local Validity as a Key to Sanity and Civilization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Leave a Line of Retreat — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Meditation on Curiosity — LessWronglesswrong.com
- In defence of epistemic modesty — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- How To Write Quickly While Maintaining Epistemic Rigor — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How Minds Change - by David McRaney | Derek Siverssive.rs
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- When Should we Argue? | Practical Ethicsblog.uehiro.ox.ac.uk
- Disagreement (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2021 Edition)plato.stanford.edu