✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

The Logic of Deterrence | SpringerLink

link.springer.com · 179 words · saved by 1 readers

The logic of deterrence, like that of chess, is much more complicated than the basic principles that define it. The simple statement of basic deterrence principles is clear, and capable of universal application: one actor prevents another from taking some action by raising the latter’s fear of the consequences that will ensue. Deterrence implies the existence of two parties, the deterrer and the deterree. Its object is to stop the deterree from taking actions against the interests of the deterrer. Its mechanisms are threats — the posing of adverse consequences for the deterree that will outweigh the gains of the contested action — and calculation — the ability of both deterrer and deterree to weigh costs and benefits in a similar fashion. This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access. Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Institutional subscriptions Unable to display preview. Download preview

Abstract The logic of deterrence, like that of chess, is much more complicated than the basic principles that define it. The simple statement of basic deterrence principles is clear, and capable of universal application: one actor prevents another from taking some action by raising the latter’s fear of the consequences that will ensue. Deterrence implies the existence of two parties, the deterrer and the deterree. Its object is to stop the deterree from taking actions against the interests of the deterrer. Its mechanisms are threats — the posing of adverse consequences for the deterree that wi

Explore this link on the map →

related reading