Bad Idea: Deterrence by Detection | Defense360
Policymakers are seeking new concepts of deterrence to confront gray zone tactics. Deterrence by detection, however, has two critical flaws, writes Emily Harding: a lack of technical capability and lack of credible will to respond.
Author’s Note: This piece has sparked a debate, which is exactly the intent of the Bad Ideas series. One point to highlight up front: there is no prospect of deterrence without detection. Detection is the foundation for any deterrence strategy, including deterrence by punishment and denial. But that is the starting point. Detection must be augmented by strong analytic work by the intelligence community, credible responses by the Department of Defense, and political will by officials from the executive and legislative branches to act on these findings. Deterrence is a multi-dimensional process,
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org
- Focus Threat Intel Capabilities at Detection Engineering (Part 4) | by Anton Chuvakin | Anton on Security | Mediummedium.com
- What is Detection Engineering and Why do I Need it?cyberseccafe.com
- Perimeterperimeter.bio
- Intrusion Detection | Computer Securitytextbook.cs161.org
- 7. DEFEND AGAINST PHYSICAL THREATS | Multipolar Active Shieldsforesightinstitute.substack.com
- Taiwan and the True Sources of Deterrence | Foreign Affairsforeignaffairs.com
- Detection Spectrum - SpecterOpsposts.specterops.io
- detection-engineering-maturity-matrixdetectionengineering.io
- Cyberwarfare - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Build for Detection Engineering, and Alerting Will Improve (Part 3) | by Anton Chuvakin | Anton on Security | Mediummedium.com
- gdm-ai-control-roadmap.pdfstorage.googleapis.com