Inevitability of Recentralization
Notes on Gordon Brander’s Decentralization enables permissionless innovation, Centralization is Inevitable and Redecentralization To be efficient is to be fragile, and to be fragile, over the long run, is to go extinct.
Notes on Gordon Brander’s Decentralization enables permissionless innovation , Centralization is Inevitable and Redecentralization To be efficient is to be fragile, and to be fragile, over the long run, is to go extinct. Network Models See also: network theory In 1959 RAND, a Californian think-tank, assigned Paul Baran, a young engineer at that time, to develop a communication system that can survive a Soviet nuclear attack. He found that: The original centralized communication system is obviously vulnerable as the destruction of the hub would destroy communication between the end stations. Th
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- The New Internet: Tailscale's Vision for the Future of Connectivitytailscale.com
- Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks - Varun Srinivasanvarunsrinivasan.com
- Centralization and Internet Standardsietf.org
- Immunology for the Internet Age • Blogurbit.org
- 100 years of whatever this will be - apenwarrapenwarr.ca
- Why decentralization matters — cdixoncdixon.org
- mek.fyi | The centralized webmek.fyi
- Why Decentralization Isn't as Important as You Think - haseeb qureshihaseebq.com
- Going Critical — Melting Asphaltmeltingasphalt.com
- Re: Re: Bluesky and Decentralization -- Dustycloud Brainstormsdustycloud.org
- Resistant protocols: How decentralization evolves - John Backus - Mediumgwern.net
- Do human designed systems always end up centralized? | by Alex Meyer | Maximum Tinkering | Mediummedium.com