How should you talk to think better? - Marginal REVOLUTION
Being a natural non-dualist, I have been pondering this question. For instance, I know someone who almost always gives charismatic and “thunderous” answers to questions posed. These are typically smart answers, whether or not you agree, but I suspect over time that talk style makes this person somewhat stupider and more dogmatic. I believe if […]
Being a natural non-dualist, I have been pondering this question. For instance, I know someone who almost always gives charismatic and “thunderous” answers to questions posed. These are typically smart answers, whether or not you agree, but I suspect over time that talk style makes this person somewhat stupider and more dogmatic. I believe if you yell your answers all the time you are also likelier to become stupider. Might the same be true for perpetual whisperers? For a steady barking yelp? Is it better to be smiling or frowning during your discourse? Should you always sound poli
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Making Normal Conversations Better - by Sasha Chapinsashachapin.substack.com
- Making Normal Conversations Better - by Sasha Chapinsashachapin.substack.com
- Good conversations have lots of doorknobsexperimental-history.com
- To listen well, get curious | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- How to Become a Better Conversationalistevery.to
- Good conversations have lots of doorknobsexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- Observations on excellent conversationalists | by Lance Katigbak | advo | Mediummedium.com
- How to Go Beyond Small Talk, and Talk About Real Stuffjasonfeifer.beehiiv.com
- Writing and Speakingpaulgraham.com
- How to always have interesting conversations — LessWronglesswrong.com
- speculation | MIT Admissionsmitadmissions.org
- How to Become a Better Conversationalistevery.to