✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Possible misconceptions about (strong) longtermism - EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 67 words · saved by 1 readers
OVERVIEW In this post I provide a brief sketch of The case for strong longtermism as put forward by Greaves and MacAskill, and proceed to raise and address possible misconceptions that people may hav…
RogerAckroyd 5y 20 0 0 It is not obvious that non-extinction is an attractor state. If there is some minimal background risk of extinction that we can not get below (whether due to asteroids, false vacuum decay, nuclear war, everyone becoming a negative utilitarian and stops reproducing, whatever) then it is the nature of exponential discounting that the very long-term future can quickly become essentially unimportant. Reply
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Why I am not a longtermist – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- A Case Against Strong Longtermism | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
- Understanding "longtermism": Why this suddenly influential philosophy is so toxic - Salon.comsalon.com
- Longtermism: An Introduction | Effective Altruismeffectivealtruism.org
- ⚡️ Towards Ineffective Altruismreboothq.substack.com
- Intro to Longtermism - Fin Moorhousefinmoorhouse.com
- Longtermism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Why I am probably not a longtermist — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- The Dangerous Ideas of “Longtermism” and “Existential Risk”currentaffairs.org
- What is longtermism? The controversial idea, explained | Voxvox.com
- Galaxy brain resistancevitalik.eth.limo
- Burkean Longtermismforourposterity.com