The average utilitarian’s solipsism wager – The Universe from an Intentional Stance
The following prudential argument is relatively common in my circles: We probably live in a simulation, but if we don’t, our actions matter much more. Thus, expected value calculations are do…
The following prudential argument is relatively common in my circles: We probably live in a simulation , but if we don’t, our actions matter much more. Thus, expected value calculations are dominated by the utility under the assumption that we (or some copies of ours) are in the real world. Consequently, the simulation argument affects our prioritization only slightly — we should still mostly act under the assumption that we are not in a simulation. A commonly cited analogy is due to Michael Vassar : “If you think you are Napoleon, and [almost] everyone that thinks this way i
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- The Lifespan Dilemma — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Self-Serving utilitarian argumentsaskell.blog
- Pascal's mugging - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Pascal's Mugging: Tiny Probabilities of Vast Utilities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Multiverse-wide Cooperation via Correlated Decision Making – Center on Long-Term Risklongtermrisk.org
- Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com
- Arguments for Utilitarianism | Utilitarianism.netutilitarianism.net
- Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Developmentnickbostrom.com
- Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?simulation-argument.com
- Open Peer Commentary on JET Volume 7jetpress.org
- Do We Live in a Simulation? Chances Are about 50–50 | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com