✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Why Computers Won’t Make Themselves Smarter | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 3,534 words · saved by 1 readers
We fear and yearn for “the singularity.” But it will probably never come.
Save this story Save this story In the eleventh century, St. Anselm of Canterbury proposed an argument for the existence of God that went roughly like this: God is, by definition, the greatest being that we can imagine; a God that doesn’t exist is clearly not as great as a God that does exist; ergo, God must exist. This is known as the ontological argument, and there are enough people who find it convincing that it’s still being discussed, nearly a thousand years later. Some critics of the ontological argument contend that it essentially defines a being into existence, and that that is not how
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- The implausibility of intelligence explosion | by François Chollet | Mediummedium.com
- When AI builds itself \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- A reply to Francois Chollet on intelligence explosionintelligence.org
- The Coming Technological Singularityedoras.sdsu.edu
- Preparing for the Intelligence Explosionforethought.org
- The Gentle Singularity - Sam Altmanblog.samaltman.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- Infinite midwit - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Carl Shulman (Pt 1) - Intelligence Explosion, Primate Evolution, Robot Doublings, & Alignmentdwarkesh.com