✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The Unpolitical Animal | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 3,977 words · saved by 1 readers
How political science understands voters.
Save this story Save this story In every Presidential-election year, there are news stories about undecided voters, people who say that they are perplexed about which candidate’s positions make the most sense. They tell reporters things like “I’d like to know more about Bush’s plan for education,” or “I’m worried that Kerry’s ideas about Social Security don’t add up.” They say that they are thinking about issues like “trust,” and whether the candidate cares about people like them. To voters who identify strongly with a political party, the undecided voter is almost an alien life form. For them
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Summary of Achen and Bartel’s Democracy for Realists – The Universe from an Intentional Stancecasparoesterheld.com
- Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Sciencestatmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
- Arrow's impossibility theorem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- interfluidity >> Your theory of politics is wronginterfluidity.com
- Investment theory of party competition - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- How People Think · Collaborative Fundcollaborativefund.com
- It's Charisma, Stupidpaulgraham.com
- Paradox of voting - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Ezra Klein on Why We’re Polarized (Ep. 86) | Conversations with Tylerconversationswithtyler.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Political representation - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- In the Land of the Data Blind, by Jason Blakelyharpers.org