✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Kernel | Trees Won’t Save Us
kernelmag.io · 3,815 words · saved by 11 readers
How many trees does it take to save the planet? It depends on who you ask. In 2019, a team of researchers led by Francois-Je...
Kernel | Trees Won’t Save Us Issue 2 nonfiction Trees Won’t Save Us written by Jacob Sujin Kuppermann How many trees does it take to save the planet? It depends on who you ask. In 2019, a team of researchers led by Francois-Jean Bastin at Thomas Crowther’s lab at ETH Zurich published a paper in Science with a dramatic prospectus for solving the climate crisis. Their model of Earth’s tree carrying capacity found that the earth could support an additional billion hectares of forest land — land for trees that could, in turn, store 205 gigatons of carbon. This was equivalent, they claimed, to two-
Explore this link on the map →saved by
- Kun Zhu
- brunella k
- Bonnie Chin
- Jules Qian
- Annie Zhou
- Ratan Kaliani
- Linda
- Julian Quevedo
- Eli Qian
- Michelle Qin
- Srinidhi Krishnamurthy
related reading
- Nadia Asparouhova | Mapping out the tribes of climatenadia.xyz
- The Social Life of Forests - The New York Timesnytimes.com
- Carbon removal hype is becoming a dangerous distraction | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Our Learnings from Bringing the First Climate-Smart Seedlings to US Marketslivingcarbon.com
- Ali Alkhatib: Digital Forestsali-alkhatib.com
- Are Genetically Modified Trees a Climate Change Solution?freethink.com
- Exploring Indigenous Beliefs About Trees and Their Connection to Them - Forest Healingsilvotherapy.co.uk
- Mixing trees and crops can help both farmers and the climatesciencenews.org
- A nonprofit promised to preserve wildlife. Then it made millions claiming it could cut down trees | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- What Do You Say to a Thinking Forest? | The Tyeethetyee.ca
- The climate solution adding millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWronglesswrong.com