✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 10,973 words · saved by 1 readers
Trees are not a biologically consistent category. They're just something that keeps happening in lots of different groups of plants. This is a fun fa…
x There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWrong Best of LessWrong 2021 Biology Evolution Philosophy of Language World Modeling Curated 350 There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by eukaryote 3rd May 2021 Linkpost for eukaryotewritesblog.com 9 min read 60 350 [Crossposted from Eukaryote Writes Blog.] So you’ve heard about how fish aren’t a monophyletic group? You’ve heard about carcinization , the process by which ocean arthropods convergently evolve into crabs? You say you get it now? Sit down. Sit down. Shut up. Listen. You don’t know nothing yet. “Trees” are not
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- How An Algorithm Feels From Inside — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Phylogenetic tree - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Plant evolutionary developmental biology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?thebaffler.com
- Softmax — The Frame-Dependent Mindsoftmax.com
- What Do You Say to a Thinking Forest? | The Tyeethetyee.ca
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Expecting Short Inferential Distances — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Prefer associative ontologies to hierarchical taxonomiesnotes.andymatuschak.org
- The Extraordinary Lives Of Coast Redwoodsnoemamag.com
- Expecting Short Inferential Distances — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How An Algorithm Feels From Inside — LessWronglesswrong.com