Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement
This article proposes that biologically plausible theories of behavior can be constructed by following a method of “phylogenetic refinement,” whereby they are progressively elaborated from simple to complex according to phylogenetic data on the sequence of changes that occurred over the course of evolution. It is argued that sufficient data exist to make this approach possible, and that the result can more effectively delineate the true biological categories of neurophysiological mechanisms than do approaches based on definitions of putative functions inherited from psychological traditions. As an example, the approach is used to sketch a theoretical framework of how basic feedback control of interaction with the world was elaborated during vertebrate evolution, to give rise to the functional architecture of the mammalian brain. The results provide a conceptual taxonomy of mechanisms that naturally map to neurophysiological and neuroanatomical data and that offer a context for defining putative functions that, it is argued, are better grounded in biology than are some of the traditional concepts of cognitive science.
Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement Time for Action: Reaching for a Better Understanding of the Dynamics of Cognition Open access Published: 03 June 2019 Volume 81 , pages 2265–2287 ( 2019 ) Cite this article You have full access to this open access article Download PDF Save article View saved research Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement Download PDF Abstract This article proposes that biologically plausible theories of behavior can be constructed by following a method of “phylogenet
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- A Crash Course in the Neuroscience of Human Motivation — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Neuroscience is pre-paradigmatic. Consciousness is whytheintrinsicperspective.com
- https://io0.github.ioio0.github.io
- The Algernon Argument · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Frequently Asked Questions - Latest Versiondrmichaellevin.org
- Neurocognitive Mechanisms: Explaining Biological Cognition | Reviews | Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews | University of Notre Damendpr.nd.edu
- There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2308.06578] The time is ripe to reverse engineer an entire nervous system: simulating behavior from neural interactionsarxiv.org
- Illuminating the Three Dogmas of RL under Evolutionary Light (Mani Hamidi) - Sensorimotor AI Journal Clubsensorimotorai.github.io
- The Philosophy of Neuroscience (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Programme January 7th - Oxford 2026 Evolution Conferenceoxford2025evolutionconference.com
- Chapter 51 - Behavioral Ecology | CourseNotescourse-notes.org