Ally Bell on X: "ad revenue always means you eventually design for addiction, not for product" / X
To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark View keyboard shortcuts Home Explore Notifications Chat SuperGrok Premium+ Bookmarks Articles Profile More Post ሶ @sofi_a Post See new posts Conversation Ally Bell @withtenacity ad revenue always means you eventually design for addiction, not for product 2:41 PM · Apr 22, 2026 · 1,857 Views 9 4 39 4 Relevant View quotes Post your reply Reply Everyone can reply aaron @0x4a756e65 · 5h yeah, i agree - or, you tank the usability/enjoyment of your product via shitty ad placement and screen takeover 1 43 Ally Bell @withtenacity · 5h or bothhh 1 1 38 aaron @0x4a756e65 · 4h exactly - probably most often, both 1 6 Ajinkyaraj @itsajinkyaraj · 7h either people pay for your product, or you make your users as your product 1 2 72 Ally Bell @withtenacity · 6h unfortunately 48 Daniel Faggella @danfaggella · 3h Every profit motive becomes perverse at the pinnacle of success and monopoly Maybe advertising perverses earlier but this occurs in more or le
@withtenacity: ad revenue always means you eventually design for addiction, not for product
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- 47 UX Case Studies To Improve Your Product Skills | Growth.Designgrowth.design
- The Addiction Economyevery.to
- No More Boring Apps | !Boringandy.works
- The Farmer & Farmer Review . Modern Medicine . The Problem of Advertisingfarmerandfarmer.org
- The Tyranny of the Marginal User - by Ivan Vendrovnothinghuman.substack.com
- Ads Don’t Work That Way | Melting Asphaltmeltingasphalt.com
- Invisible asymptotes - Remains of the Dayeugenewei.com
- A Comprehensive Guide To Product Design — Smashing Magazinesmashingmagazine.com
- 50 Things I Learned | Cheng-Wei Huchengweihu.com
- Make product worse, get moneydynomight.net
- No More Boring Apps | !Boringnotboring.software
- Principles of Product Designbokardo.com