Computer Scientists Can’t Treat Social and Ethical Impacts as an Afterthought
A new National Academies of Science report argues that researchers must start projects with ethical review, working with stakeholders and experts from other fields.
A new National Academies of Science report argues that researchers must start projects with ethical review, working with stakeholders and experts from other fields. When people sound alarms about ethical and social pitfalls in computing, especially artificial intelligence, they are often reacting to systems that are already in use. How should a social media platform handle algorithms that amplify hate speech and misinformation? Do systems that evaluate creditworthiness or job applications have hidden racial or gender biases? Does facial recognition jeopardize privacy? But a new report from an
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Ali Alkhatib: Anthropological/Artificial Intelligence & the HAIali-alkhatib.com
- moral-fn.pdfweb.cs.ucdavis.edu
- Tech Strikes Back - The New Atlantisthenewatlantis.com
- AI 2030 | Encode Justiceai2030.encodejustice.org
- Preparing for Launch | IFPifp.org
- Import AI 431: Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fearimportai.substack.com
- Danger, AI Scientist, Danger - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work on — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI safety technical research | Career review | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- ClearerThinking.org Podcast | Is AI going to ruin everything? (with Gabriel Alfour)podcast.clearerthinking.org