✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 4,666 words · saved by 1 readers
At artificial-intelligence conferences, researchers are increasingly alarmed by what they see.
Save this story Save this story In computer science, the main outlets for peer-reviewed research are not journals but conferences, where accepted papers are presented in the form of talks or posters. In June, 2019, at a large artificial-intelligence conference in Long Beach, California, called Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, I stopped to look at a poster for a project called Speech2Face . Using machine learning, researchers had developed an algorithm that generated images of faces from recordings of speech. A neat idea, I thought, but one with unimpressive results: at best, the faces
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Computer Scientists Can’t Treat Social and Ethical Impacts as an Afterthought | Stanford HAIhai.stanford.edu
- Import AIjack-clark.net
- GitHub - daviddao/awful-ai: 😈Awful AI is a curated list to track current scary usages of AI - hoping to raise awareness · GitHubgithub.com
- Import AI 431: Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fearimportai.substack.com
- Danger, AI Scientist, Danger - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- Ali Alkhatib: Anthropological/Artificial Intelligence & the HAIali-alkhatib.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- AI 2030 | Encode Justiceai2030.encodejustice.org
- There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Import AI 431: Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fearimportai.substack.com
- AI #24: Week of the Podcast — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI #80: Never Will It Ever - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com