✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
AI bias and AI safety teams are divided on artificial intelligence - Vox
vox.com · 1,613 words · saved by 1 readers
AI poses present risks and future ones. Why don’t the teams that work on them get along?
Future Perfect There are two factions working to prevent AI dangers. Here’s why they’re deeply divided. AI poses present risks and future ones. Why don’t the teams that work on them get along? by Kelsey Piper Aug 10, 2022, 11:30 AM UTC Artificial intelligence systems are getting more and more impressive. The people who work on ensuring they have good effects are beset by internal squabbling. Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Kelsey Piper is a contributing editor at Future Perfect, Vox’s effective altruism-inspired section on the world’s biggest challenges. She explores wide-ranging topics
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- A Field Guide to AI Safety—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- A guide to the AI tribes - by Michel Justen - What is thismicheljusten.substack.com
- Which side of the AI safety community are you in? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- I Would Have Solved Alignment, But I Was Worried That Would Advance Timelines — LessWronglesswrong.com
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- Ten people on the inside — LessWronglesswrong.com