✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Which side of the AI safety community are you in? — LessWrong

lesswrong.com · 9,351 words · saved by 2 readers

In recent years, I’ve found that people who self-identify as members of the AI safety community have increasingly split into two camps: Camp A) "Race to superintelligence safely”: People in this group typically argue that "superintelligence is inevitable because of X”, and it's therefore better that their in-group (their company or country) build it first. X is typically some combination of “Capitalism”, “Molloch”, “lack of regulation” and “China”. Camp B) “Don’t race to superintelligence”: People in this group typically argue that “racing to superintelligence is bad because of Y”. Here Y is typically some combination of “uncontrollable”, “1984”, “disempowerment” and “extinction”. Whereas the 2023 extinction statement  was widely signed by both Camp B and Camp A (including Dario Amodei, Demis Hassabis and Sam Altman), the 2025 superintelligence statement conveniently separates the two groups – for example, I personally offered all US Frontier AI CEO’s to sign, and none chose to do so.

x Which side of the AI safety community are you in? — LessWrong AI Frontpage 2025 Top Fifty: 12 % 145 Which side of the AI safety community are you in? by Max Tegmark 22nd Oct 2025 2 min read 88 145 In recent years, I’ve found that people who self-identify as members of the AI safety community have increasingly split into two camps: Camp A) "Race to superintelligence safely”: People in this group typically argue that "superintelligence is inevitable because of X”, and it's therefore better that their in-group (their company or country) build it first. X is typically some combination of “Capita

Explore this link on the map →

saved by

related reading