✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Why “Win More” is not a problem in Netrunner - StimHack

stimhack.com · 3,124 words · saved by 1 readers

Those who have played and studied Magic have probably heard of the idea of something being a “Win More” card. That is, that the only utility the card has, is that when you play it in a position where you’re already winning, it makes you win even more. It doesn’t do anything to take you from even to winning, and it doesn’t do anything when you’re losing. An article example about the topic, for the uninitiated: http://www.starcitygames.com/article/22972_Win-More-And-Lose-Less.html And here is a card that’s pretty win more: You couldn’t just get one expensive big guy. You couldn’t just get three expensive big guys. You’re actually going to try to play this a second time from out of your discard for three MORE? Winning big, winning really impressively, is just worth 1 game of a 3 game match in Magic. It’s valued just as much as barely squeaking out a win. This type of card, therefore, typically ends up being a bad inclusion in your deck. A card that ‘bad’ players use in order to win v

Why “Win More” is not a problem in Netrunner - StimHack Why “Win More” is not a problem in Netrunner Alexfrog • June 26, 2013 Those who have played and studied Magic have probably heard of the idea of something being a “Win More” card. That is, that the only utility the card has, is that when you play it in a position where you’re already winning, it makes you win even more. It doesn’t do anything to take you from even to winning, and it doesn’t do anything when you’re losing. An article example about the topic, for the uninitiated: http://www.starcitygames.com/article/22972_Win-Mo

Explore this link on the map →

related reading