✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Of Course We’re Living in a Simulation | WIRED
wired.com · 3,715 words · saved by 1 readers
The only people who absolutely disagree are, well, scientists. They need to get over themselves and join the fun.
Save this story Save this story The best theory physicists have for the birth of the universe makes no sense. It goes like this: In the beginning—the very, if not quite veriest, beginning—there’s something called quantum foam. It’s barely there, and can’t even be said to occupy space, because there’s no such thing as space yet. Or time. So even though it’s seething, bubbling, fluctuating, as foam tends to do, it’s not doing so in any kind of this-before-that temporal order. It just is, all at once, indeterminate and undisturbed. Until it isn’t. Something goes pop in precisely the right way, an
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Do We Live in a Simulation? Chances Are about 50–50 | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?simulation-argument.com
- Exploring mind-bending questions about reality and virtual worlds via The Matrix - Ars Technicaarstechnica.com
- The Beginning of Infinity, Part 1nav.al
- The man rethinking the definition of realitybbc.com
- Boltzmann brain - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Here’s Why We Might Live in a Multiverse | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Are You Living in a Simulation?simulation-argument.com
- Open Peer Commentary on JET Volume 7jetpress.org
- Simulation Inferences · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Philip K. Dick: How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two Days Laterhex.ooo