✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Dan Hendrycks on Twitter: "@BasedBeffJezos 2/ He argues that we should build AGI to colonize the cosmos ASAP because there is so much potential at stake. This cost-benefit analysis is wrong. For every year we delay building AGI, we lose a galaxy. However, if we go extinct in the process, we lose the entire cosmos. Cosmic… https://t.co/x2cAELKg4p" / Twitter

twitter.com · 93 words · saved by 1 readers

To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark View keyboard shortcuts Messages Tweet See new Tweets Conversation Dan Hendrycks @DanHendrycks · Apr 27 "The founder of effective accelerationism" and AI arms race advocate @BasedBeffJezos just backed out of tomorrow's debate with me. His intellectual defense for why we should build AI hastily is unfortunately based on predictable misunderstandings. I compile these errors below 1.9 x 21 64 440 138.6K Dan Hendrycks @DanHendrycks 2/ He argues that we should build AGI to colonize the cosmos ASAP because there is so much potential at stake. This cost-benefit analysis is wrong. For every year we delay building AGI, we lose a galaxy. However, if we go extinct in the process, we lose the entire cosmos. Cosmic stakes heavily push toward caution, not haste. http://nickbostrom.com/astronomical/waste… 5:12 PM · Apr 27, 2023 · 10.5K Views 5 Retweets 3 Quotes 126 Likes 6 Bookmarks 1.9 x Tweet your reply! Reply Dan Hendrycks @DanHendrycks ·

Dan Hendrycks @hendrycks Replying to @hendrycks and @beffjezos 2/ He argues that we should build AGI to colonize the cosmos ASAP because there is so much potential at stake. This cost-benefit analysis is wrong. For every year we delay building AGI, we lose a galaxy. However, if we go extinct in the process, we lose the entire cosmos. Cosmic stakes heavily push toward caution, not haste. nickbostrom.com/astronomical/w… 12:12 AM · Apr 28, 2023 20.9K Views 8 0 8 6 0 6 180 0 1 8 0 20 0 2 0 Read 8 replies

Explore this link on the map →

related reading