✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 14,624 words · saved by 1 readers
One, two, and three are all integers, and so is negative four. If you keep counting up, or keep counting down, you’re bound to encounter a whole lot…
x 0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities — LessWrong Overly Convenient Excuses Probability & Statistics Frontpage 132 0 And 1 Are Not Probabilities by Eliezer Yudkowsky 10th Jan 2008 5 min read 149 132 One, two, and three are all integers, and so is negative four. If you keep counting up, or keep counting down, you’re bound to encounter a whole lot more integers. You will not, however, encounter anything called “positive infinity” or “negative infinity,” so these are not integers. Positive and negative infinity are not integers, but rather special symbols for talking about the behavior of integers. Peo
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- 275A, Notes 0: Foundations of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Imprecise Probabilities (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Sets of Measure Zero in Probability | Jonathan Manton's Blogjmanton.wordpress.com
- 275A, Notes 0: Foundations of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Economics Dictionary of Argumentsphilosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com
- Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com
- Introduction to Probability by Joseph K. Blitzstein, Jessica Hwang (z-lib.org).pdfuni.dcdev.ro
- 254A, Notes 0: A review of probability theory | What's newterrytao.wordpress.com
- Probability for Philosophers - by Oak - Offhand Quibblesoffhandquibbles.substack.com