✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx
columbia.edu · 3,484 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
# link_1z4dqoqle3s.pdf ## Metadata - PDFFormatVersion=1.4 - Language=en - IsLinearized=false - IsAcroFormPresent=false - IsXFAPresent=false - IsCollectionPresent=false - IsSignaturesPresent=false - Title=Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx - Producer=Skia/PDF m146 Google Docs Renderer ## Contents ### Page 1 Comments on Williamson’s Good as Usual APA Eastern Division, 2026 Justin Clarke-Doane Columbia University Punch line: Even if Williamson is right that normative discourse often expresses mind-independent truths, many of which we know (Good as Usual, 2025, p. 4)
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The ignorance of normative realism bot - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Deliberate Oncemindingourway.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Normativity in Metaethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Seeing more whole - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Pragmatism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Alienation and meta-ethics (or: is it possible you should maximize helium?) - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Is–ought problem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On attunement - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Reflective Equilibrium (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu